- They
made their debut at the “Café Colón” and were immediately
hired to perform at the aristocratic “Vogue’s club”.
Almost at the same time, they inaugurated the “Chantecler”
cabaret, and after that they started a long career around the
most important Buenos Aires cinemas. During the first period of
de Caro’s orchestra, it was very noticeable the temperamental
influence of Pedro Maffia’s bandoneon. The death of contrabass
player Leopoldo Thompson (successively replaced by Hugo Baralis,
Olindo Sinibaldi, Enrique Krauss and Vicente Sciarreta) and the
posterior departures of bandoneon players Luis Petrucelli and
Pedro Maffia, determined the restructuring of De Caro’s
orchestra. In this new period, the bandoneon players were Pedro
Laurenz and Armando Blasco; and Emilio De Caro, second
violinist, was replaced by José Nieso. This may have been the
most representative period of the orchestra, which caused a real
revolution in tango. They tried to join musical techniques
resources, specially referring to counterpoint and harmony, with
their own rhythmic and melodic essence. The development of the
interpretative labour of De Caro’s orchestra was condensed in
a phrase that says that “tango is also music”, and greater
musicality required greater technical learning from the
musicians. Piano’s harmonized accompaniment; bandoneon
phrasings and variations; violin’s countersinging knitting
melodies that were nicely contrasting to the main theme; and
piano and bandoneon’s solos, which expressed an harmonic and
sonic riches that had remained unknown until that moment, were
some of the most valuable innovations those real revolutionaries
introduced in tango playing.
We also have to mention the rhythmic game in which
different marcations in charge of each sector of the orchestra
were perceived as a backdrop, while violins or bandoneons were
singing in the foreground. Julio De Caro’s school opened new
musical perspectives for tango. It was admired by some
musicians, and despised by others, but it is unquestionable that
it definitely separated tango into two opposite streams, which
were irremediably confronted from that moment on. Both artists
and musicians would have to choose between two different ways of
expressing and feeling tango. The first was the
“evolutionist” stream,
inaugurated by Juan Carlos Cobián, Osvaldo Fresedo and Julio De
Caro. The other one was the “traditional” stream, which was
grasped to the old playing formulas. They would both make
tango’s instrumental history go for different paths.
|
|